The arrival of the DANA in Spain, particularly in the Valencia region, was widely anticipated in the days before the event. Spain’s State Meteorological Agency (AEMET) had been issuing warnings as early as Wednesday, October 23, when, at 19:02, it reported that “a cold air pocket will detach from the general circulation, leading to the formation of a DANA,” though it was still too early to precisely pinpoint the areas of greatest impact. In the days following, AEMET continued updating its alerts, stressing the intensity of the expected rains along the Mediterranean arc and urging the public to stay informed about local forecasts.

At 11:17 a.m. on Thursday, October 25, Juan Jesús González Alemán, PhD in Physics and Senior Meteorologist at AEMET, posted a message on social media where he warned that this DANA, due to its characteristics and behavior, “has high potential to enter the category of high-impact events; one that will be remembered on the Mediterranean side.” His post quickly went viral, both for its urgent tone and for the skepticism that some expressed regarding the accuracy of his predictions—predictions that would soon prove correct.

That same day, October 25, AEMET continued to warn about the approaching DANA, noting that “rains along the Mediterranean slope could be very heavy.”

Media outlets began to widely share this information, and by Sunday, October 27, they were already announcing torrential rains in Valencia and Murcia, anticipating the storm’s impact.

As the DANA neared, various entities, including the Emergency Coordination Center 112 in Valencia, the National Civil Protection Service, the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Ecological Transition, and the Castellón Fire Department, echoed the warnings.

Through social media and news outlets, they urged people to avoid driving and to check if their homes were located in flood-prone areas. Risk maps were even provided to help people make informed decisions.

Despite these warnings, preventive measures at the local and regional government levels were limited. Although on October 29 some activities were suspended at the Port of Valencia and in certain schools in the Valencia region, a comprehensive school closure was not enacted, nor was a maximum alert issued to halt activity in the area entirely.

The warnings in the media seemed not to align with practical measures, leading to public confusion about the severity of the phenomenon. This lack of precautionary measures drew criticism in the aftermath, with citizens questioning whether more could have been done to prevent the tragedy.

Photo credit: NASA / Kike Taberner

This article was prepared by our Fixer in Spain team, seeking to clarify whether authorities were adequately informed of the DANA and if more preventive measures could have mitigated the impact.

Loading

SENDING

Thank you.

Your message has been sent successfully.

REFRESH

For urgent inquiries please call to 0034 650 509 184 or e-mail to info@spainfixer.com
Fill out the form below and we will contact you as soon as possible.

  • Personal Details